苹果拒绝破解加州枪案袭击者手机

 行业新闻     |      2021-02-06 07:00
本文摘要:San Francisco-applesaidonwednesdaythatitwouldopposeandchallengeafederalcourtordertohelpthef.b.I.unlockaniphoneu twoattackerse dino,Calif .in December .旧金山——苹果本周三赞成并批评联邦法院拒绝协助联邦调查局(FBI )级别的iPhone。去年12月,两名袭击者在加利福尼亚州圣伯纳迪诺杀了14人,其中一人被这个手机使用过。

鸭脖app官网

San Francisco-applesaidonwednesdaythatitwouldopposeandchallengeafederalcourtordertohelpthef.b.I.unlockaniphoneu twoattackerse dino,Calif .in December .旧金山——苹果本周三赞成并批评联邦法院拒绝协助联邦调查局(FBI )级别的iPhone。去年12月,两名袭击者在加利福尼亚州圣伯纳迪诺杀了14人,其中一人被这个手机使用过。On Tuesday,inasignificantvictoryforthegovernment, magistratejudgesheripymofthefederaldistrictcourtforthedistrictofcentralcaliforniaorderedappletobypasssecurityfunctionsonaniphoo zwan Farook,whowaskilledbythepolicealongwithiswife,Tashfeen Malik,aftertheyattackedmr.farook’SCO-workersataholidaygatherie 法克和妻子塔什芬马利克攻击了同事的节日派对,然后两人都被警察射杀了。judgepymorderedappletobuildspecialsoftwarethatwouldessentiallyactaskeletonkeycapableofunlockingthephone .皮姆法官是苹果公司专用的软件But hours later,inastatementbyitschiefexecutive,Timothy D. Cook, appleannounceditsrefusaltocomply.themovesetsupalegalshowdownbetweenthecompany是whichsaysitiseagertoprotecttheprivacyofitscuse andthelawenforcementauthorities, whosaythatnewencryptiontechnologieshampertheirabilitytopreventandsolvecrime .但几小时后,苹果首席执行官蒂莫西d库克(timothyd.crime ) In his statement, MR.cookcalledthecourtorderan“unprecedented step”bythefederalgovernment .“weopposethisorder”whichasimplicationsfarbeyondther “我们赞成这个命令。

那是因为它的意义远远超出了眼前法律的判例范畴”,他写道。askedaboutapple’s resistance, thejusticedepartmentpointedtoastatementbyeileenm.decker是, theunitedstatesattorneyforthecentraldistrictofcalifornia :“wehavemadeasolemncommitmenttothevictimsandtheirfamiliesthatwat” egatherasmuchinformationandevidenceaspossible.thesevictimsandfamiliesdeservenothingless .”时司法部(Justice Department )在卡里夫“我们已经对受害者及其家人作出了肃清承诺,我们没有想办法收集尽可能多的情报和证据。这是受害者和家人理所当然的应对”。

thef.b.I.saidthatitsexpertshadbeenunabletoaccessdataonmr.farook’siphone, andthatonlyapplecouldbypassitssecurityfeatures.f.b.I.expertshavesaidtheyrisklosingthedatapermanentlyafter 10 fails erthepasswing ityfeatures .联邦调查局称,他们的专家不能提供fake IPhone上的数据,只有苹果才能克服其安全功能。联邦调查局的专家们回答说,通过这个手机的安全功能,10次密码输出结束后,手机上的数据有可能永久丢失。thejusticedepartmenthadsecuredasearchwarrantforthephone,ownedbymr.farook’sformeremployer已经取得了对该手机的搜查令,作为机长becauseappledeclinedtovoluntarilyprovide,in essence, the“keys”toitsencryptiontechnology是federalprosecutorssaidtheysawlittlechoicebuttogetajudgetocompelapple’s assistance .是阿MR.cooksaidtheorderwouldamounttocreatinga“back door”tobypassapple’sstrongencryptionstandards -“something we”“andsomethingwer” ”库克说,他们拒绝制造“后门”,等于穿越苹果强大的加密系统——。

“我们显然没有这样的东西,所以指出做这样的东西太危险了。》In 2014, appleandgoogle-whoseoperatingsystemsareusedin 96 percentofsmartphonesworldwide-announcedthattheyhadre-engineeredtheid“full DD andcouldnolongerunlocktheirownproductsasaresult.2014年,苹果和谷歌3354全球96%的智能手机用于发布这些操作系统3354。

thatsetupaconfrontationwithpoliceandprosecutors,who want the companies to build,in essence, amasterkeythatcanbeusedtogetaroundtheencryption.thetechnologycompaniessaythatcreatingsuchakeywouldhavedisastrousconsequence or 因为期待着能构筑超越tem的主密钥,所以双方之间经常发生对立。技术公司回答说,构建这样的密钥在隐私方面不会带来灾难性的后果。“thef.b.I.mayusedifferentwordstodescribethistool, butmakenomistake : buildingaversionofiosthatbypassessecurityinthiswaywouldundeniablycreateabackdoor, “MR.cook Wrote .”Andwhilethe Gover NMent Mayar Guet Hatits use would Belimite Dtothiscase说:“FBI可能用其他语言表达了这个工具,但不要被误解。

库克写道:“通过构建这样一个跨越安全屏障的iOS版本,我们无疑做了后门。” “政府可能主张在本案中只能用于这个后门,但他们不能保证将来会失控。》anapplespokeswomandeclinedtoelaborateonthestatement,butthecompany’smostlikelynextstepistofileanappeal .苹果发言人关于这项声明thelegalissuesarecomplicated.theyinvolvestatutoryinterpretation,rather than constitutional rights,andtheycouldendupbeet这些是宪法的As Apple noted,the F.B.I .insteadofaskingcongresstopasslegislationresolvingtheencryptionfight, hasproposedwhatappearstobeanovelreadingoftheallwritsactof 1789 .正如苹果公司认为的那样,联邦调查局不是拒绝议会通过法律解决问题,而是在1789年的《所有令状法案》 (a thelawletsjudges“issueallwritsnecessaryorappropriateinaidoftheirrespectivejurisdictionsandagreeabletotheusagesandprinciplees” 或者在各自管辖区得到必要的协助,符合法律限制和原则的情况下,允许“签发所有搜查令”。thegovernmentsaysthelawgivesbroadlatitudetojudgestorequire“third Parties”toexecutecourtorders.ithascited, among orders a 1977 rulingrequiringphonecompaniestohelpsetupapenregister, adevicethatrecordsallnumberscalledfromaparticularphoneline .政府援引的几个事件,在1977年的判决中拒绝向电话公司追加电话号码记录装置(pen register ) 苹果,in turn,arguesthatthescopeoftheacthasstrictlimits.in 2005,afederalmagistratejudgerejectedtheargumentthatthelawcouldbeuuearch warrant .和苹果公司指出,该法案的适用范围有严格的允许。

2005年,一位联邦治安法官判断无法使用该法律,未经搜查令允许通信服务提供商动态跟踪手机。Marc J. Zwillinger,a lawyer for Apple, wroteinaletterforarelatedcaseinoctoberthattheallwritsactcouldnotbeinterpretedto“forceacompanytotakepossionofadeviceout”sideot dperformservicesonthatdevice是, particularlywherethecompanydoesnotperformsuchservicesaspartofitsbusinessandtheremaybealternativemeansofobtainingtherequestedin government .”苹果律师马克j施威灵格去年10月关于事件的发信说:“通过理解《所有令状法案》,“不能强制来”。

thegovernmentsaysitdoesnothavethosealternativemeans .政府支持,但没有其他手段。MR.cook’sstatementcalledthegovernment’Sdemands“Chilling .”库克在声明中说,政府的拒绝“令人感到寒冷”。

he added :“ifthegovernmentcanusetheallwritsacttomakeiteasiertounlockyouriphone, itwouldhavethepowertoreachintoanyone’sdevicetocapturetheirdata.thegovernmentcouldextendthisbreachofprivacyanddemandthaaaach buu interceptyourmessages,accessyourhealthrecordsorfinancialdata,track your location,orevenaccessyourphone’smicrophoneorcamerawii 政府扩展了这种侵犯隐私的做法,苹果拒绝写监视软件屏蔽你的信息,采访你的健康记录和金融数据,跟踪你的位置, 在你不知道的情况下采访手机麦克风和照相机theelectronicfrontierfoundation,anon profitor ganization thatdefend sdigitalrights, said it was siding with Apple .维持数字权利的非营利组织电子前端基金会“thegovernmentisaskingappletocreateamasterkeysothatitcanopenasinglephone。“itsaidtuesdayevening .“andoncethatmasterkeyiscreated,we’recertainthatourgovernmentwillaskforitagainandagain, andturnthispoweragainstanysoftwareordevicethathastheaudacitytoofferstrongsecurity .”“政府拒绝制作主键,让苹果找到手机。” “如果制作了这把钥匙,政府可以同意不重复找到其他手机,也不拒绝三次,而是使用这样的权力,被认为是公开获得强大安全性能的软件和设备。

》thesanbernardinocaseisthemostprominentsuchcase,but it is not the first .圣贝娜迪诺事件是这类事件中最不引人注目的事件,但不是第一个。Last October,James Orenstein,afederalmagistratejudgeinbrooklyn, expresseddoubtsaboutwhetherhecouldrequireappletodisableitslatestiphonesecurityfeatures, citingthefailureofcongresstoresolvetheissuedespitetheurgingofthejusticedepartment .去年10月,布鲁克林联邦治安法官詹姆斯奥伦斯汀(James Oren 我之所以担心苹果能否拒绝停止使用最新的iPhone安全功能,是因为尽管司法部再三劝说,国会还是没能解决问题。thejudgesaidsuchrequestsshouldfallunderadifferentlaw,thecommunicationsassistanceforlawenforcementactof 1994, whichcoverstelecommunicationsandbroadbandcompanies .法官认为这种催促是另一法律的首府1994年《所有令状法案》 (communicationsassistanceforlaw ) congresshasbeendebatingwhethertoamendthatacttoincludetechnologycompanieslikeapple, Facebook and Google是Andjudgeorensteinsaidhewouldconsiderorderingappletounlockthephonewhenandifcongressmakesthechange.thatcases 案件涉及的东西还在审理中。althoughappleisportrayingitsoppositiontojudgepym’sorderasaprincipleddefenseofprivacy, oneofitsmotivationsisthepreservationofitsreputationforrobustencryption, atatimeofrisingconcernsaboutidentitytheft是cybercrimeandelectronicsurveillancebyintelligenceagenciesandoverzealouslawenforcems 但是,现在的用户对身份盗窃、网络犯罪、情报机构的电子监视、执法机构的越境行为感到越来越深的感情,苹果的动机之一是保持其强大的密码技术声誉。

applealsosaysthatamasterkeywouldamounttoavulnerabilitythathackerscouldexploit.apple还表示主密钥不包含安全顾虑,可以利用黑客chinaiswatchingthedisputeclosely.analystssaythatthechinesegovernmentdoestakecuesfromtheunitedstateswhenitcomestoencryption atii andthatitwouldmostlikelydemandthatmultinationalcompaniesprovideaccommodationssimilartothoseintheunitedstates .中国在那里分析者认为信息加密最后一年, beijingbackedoffseveralproposalsthatwouldhavemandatedthatforeignfirmsprovideencryptionkeysfordevicessoldinchinaafterheavypresss roups.nonetheless是, achineseantiterrorismlawpassedindecemberrequiredforeignfirmstohandovertechnicalinformationandtoaidwithdecryptionwhenthepolicede rism-related cases .去年北京方面明确提出了一些法规,拒绝归还外国企业在中国销售的设备的加密密钥。但是,在外国行业团体强烈施加压力后,北京妥协了。尽管如此,中国去年12月通过的DEA法拒绝归还外国企业的技术信息,在恐怖事件中拒绝协助警察。

whileitisstillnotclearhowthelawmightbecarriedout。itispossibleapushfromamericanlawenforcementagenciestounlockiphoneswouldemboldenbeijingtodemandthesame.chinawouldalsomostline p ythatwouldallowittounlockiphones.justafterappleintroducedtougherencryptionstandardsin 2014, appleusersinchinaweretargetedbyanattackthatsoughttoobtainlogininformationfromicloudusers .虽然不确定该法律是如何实施的,但美国执法机构中国也接近可能拒绝获得水平iPhone的任何技术。

苹果于2014年推出强大的加密标准后,中国苹果用户受到黑客攻击,黑客要求获取iCloud用户的指定信息。


本文关键词:苹果,拒绝,破解,加州,枪案,袭击者,手机,San,鸭脖app官网

本文来源:鸭脖app下载-www.atelier-anone.com